On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:28 AM Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > I think the above example forgets "-a" on the final "git commit" > step. With it added, I can understand the concern (and I am sure > you would, too). > > The user is trying to add everything done in the working tree, and > "commit -a" would catch all changes to paths that were already > tracked, but a separate "add" is necessary for newly created paths. > But adding a new path means the index no longer matches HEAD, and > the "commit -a" at the final step sweeps the changes to already > tracked paths---failing that because there "already is something > staged" will break the workflow.
Right. I think this would need to be able to understand the case of "different only by new files". Thanks, Jake
