Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> I made this same mistake over and over again, myself. For some reason,
> John Keeping decided to use the singular form "revision" in 1e0dacdbdb75
> (rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-point, 2014-07-16), not
> the plural.
Perhaps we should give a synonym to the option? Renaming it to the
plural form may keep the existing usage working as it would be the
unique abbreviation, which may be a way to reduce the mistake.
>
> So you will need to squash this in:
>
> -- snipsnap --
> diff --git a/git-legacy-rebase.sh b/git-legacy-rebase.sh
> index fb0395af5b1..7600765f541 100755
> --- a/git-legacy-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-legacy-rebase.sh
> @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ run_interactive () {
> test -n "$autosquash" && autosquash="--autosquash"
> test -n "$verbose" && verbose="--verbose"
> test -n "$force_rebase" && force_rebase="--no-ff"
> - test -n "$restrict_revisions" && \
> - restrict_revisions="--restrict-revisions=^$restrict_revisions"
> + test -n "$restrict_revision" && \
> + restrict_revision="--restrict-revision=^$restrict_revision"
> test -n "$upstream" && upstream="--upstream=$upstream"
> test -n "$onto" && onto="--onto=$onto"
> test -n "$squash_onto" && squash_onto="--squash-onto=$squash_onto"
