Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: >> I find the design a bit iffy in that our usual "missing in the >> working tree? let's use the latest blob" fallback is to take it >> from the index, not from the HEAD. > > I am not sure; why does it feel iffy?
Why doesn't it? There is no justification why it has to be different from others and read from HEAD bypassing index.
