Phillip Wood <[email protected]> writes: > Yes I think the earlier approach with the more robust detection you > suggested is probably a good compromise. Junio does that sound good to > you?
Surely, and thanks.
Phillip Wood <[email protected]> writes: > Yes I think the earlier approach with the more robust detection you > suggested is probably a good compromise. Junio does that sound good to > you?
Surely, and thanks.