On 7/21/2018 3:21 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 2:34 AM Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> wrote:
diff --git a/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh b/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
@@ -392,4 +392,17 @@ test_expect_success 'commit --amend -s places the sign-off
at the right place' '
+test_expect_failure 'failed cherry-pick with sparse-checkout' '
+ pristine_detach initial &&
+ git config core.sparseCheckout true &&
Should this be test_config()?
I think using test_config() here is fine but...
+ echo /unrelated >.git/info/sparse-checkout &&
+ git read-tree --reset -u HEAD &&
+ test_must_fail git cherry-pick -Xours picked>actual &&
+ test_i18ngrep ! "Changes not staged for commit:" actual &&
+ echo "/*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout &&
+ git read-tree --reset -u HEAD &&
+ git config core.sparseCheckout false &&
See question above.
+ rm .git/info/sparse-checkout
Should this cleanup be done by test_when_finished()?
I think trying to use test_when_finished() for this really degrades the
readability of the test. See below:
test_expect_success 'failed cherry-pick with sparse-checkout' '
pristine_detach initial &&
test_config core.sparsecheckout true &&
echo /unrelated >.git/info/sparse-checkout &&
git read-tree --reset -u HEAD &&
test_when_finished "echo \"/*\" >.git/info/sparse-checkout && git
read-tree --reset -u HEAD && rm .git/info/sparse-checkout" &&
test_must_fail git cherry-pick -Xours picked>actual &&
test_i18ngrep ! "Changes not staged for commit:" actual
'
Given it takes multiple commands, I'd prefer to keep the setup and
cleanup of the sparse checkout settings symmetrical.
