> As we discussed during the review on v1, ":/<substring in commit>"
> is *NOT* pathspec (that is why having these tests in t4208 is wrong
> but we are following existing mistakes).

Ah, I understand the terminology better now. Thanks. I'll change the
commit message wording to use "extended SHA-1s" instead of "pathspecs".

> Now you have Peff's sign-off for the one-liner code change, the last
> one is redundant.

Okay: I'll remove the "Based-on-patch-by" line.

> Other than the above two nits, the patch looks good.  I would have
> broken the line after "including HEAD.", but the slightly-long line
> is also OK.

Happy to change this while making the above edits. :-)

Best,
WC

Reply via email to