On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:19 AM Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:53 PM Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +midx_read_expect () {
> > + cat >expect <<-EOF
> > + header: 4d494458 1 0 0
> > + object_dir: .
> > + EOF
> > + test-tool read-midx . >actual &&
> > + test_cmp expect actual
> > +}
> > +
> > test_expect_success 'write midx with no packs' '
> > git multi-pack-index --object-dir=. write &&
> > - test_path_is_file pack/multi-pack-index
> > + test_path_is_file pack/multi-pack-index &&
> > + midx_read_expect
>
> Kind of a do-nothing change. I wonder if this step would better be
> delayed until a later patch. (Not necessarily a big deal.)
Never mind. I missed that midx_read_expect() is comparing the 'expect'
and 'actual' files, so this is not a do-nothing change. The function
name may have helped to mislead me (or I was just unobservant or too
focused on its creation of the 'expect' file). I wonder if a different
name would have helped. midx_check(), midx_verify()? Meh.
