Jeff King <[email protected]> writes: > One thing that gave me pause on ripping out more code is that I have > some bitmap-related patches on my send-to-upstream list, and I wasn't > sure if they used any of this code. But I checked against your patches, > and no, this can all go (which makes sense -- my patches are about using > .bitmap files in more places, so they build at a higher level). > > So your patches look good to me, modulo the declarations that Ramsay > noticed should be removed, too.
I'll queue your 1/3 and 4/3 (without 2&3/3) for now and let Derrick and you handle the removal of unused stuff separately on top, so that the fix-proper can graduate earlier than the rest. Thanks.
