On 6/8/2018 4:07 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 07.06.2018 um 16:12 schrieb g...@jeffhostetler.com:
From: Jeff Hostetler <jeffh...@microsoft.com>
[...]
+ if (jw->first_stack.buf[jw->first_stack.len - 1] == '1')
+ jw->first_stack.buf[jw->first_stack.len - 1] = '0';
+ else
+ strbuf_addch(&jw->json, ',');
You only need a binary flag to indicate if a comma is needed, not a
stack. We need a comma at the current level if and only if we already
wrote a child item. If we finish a level then we do need a comma at the
previous level because we just wrote a sub-object or sub-array there.
And that should cover all cases. Am I missing something?
I get a sense of déjà vu, by the way. :)
[...]
Yes, your way is simpler. I'll update and re-roll.
(And yes, we did discuss this earlier. I found a problem with
my first version where it wouldn't handle empty sub-items, but
you found the missing piece.)
Thanks
Jeff
