Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Tan wrote:
>> The corresponding code for protocol v2 in process_acks() does not have
>> the same problem, because the invoker of process_acks()
>> (do_fetch_pack_v2()) proceeds immediately to processing the packfile
>
> nit: s/proceeds/procedes/
Whoops. My spellchecker deceived me.
I even checked Wiktionary and found that it was a verb there and didn't
bother to look at the definition:
Misspelling of proceed
You already had the right spelling.
Sorry for the noise,
Jonathan
