Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> Hmm, actually, I suppose the true value of the warning is to help people
> doing "git branch -l foo", and it would still work there. The "more
> extreme" from your suggested patch would only affect "branch -l".
> Still, I think I prefer the gentler version that we get by keeping it as
> a warning even in the latter case.
"git branch -l newbranch [forkpoint]" that warns "We won't be doing
reflog creation with -l" is good, but "git branch -l" that warns "We
won't be doing reflog creation with -l" sounds like a pure noise, as
the user would say "Irrelevant, I am not doing that anyway--I am
listing".
The warning to prepare users for the next step jk/branch-l-1-removal
should say "we won't be accepting '-l' as a silent and unadvertised
synonym soon. Spell it as --list" when "git branch -l" is given, I
would think.
> @@ -700,6 +700,11 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char
> *prefix)
> if (list)
> setup_auto_pager("branch", 1);
>
> + if (used_deprecated_reflog_option) {
> + warning("the '-l' alias for '--create-reflog' is deprecated;");
> + warning("it will be removed in a future version of Git");
> + }
So from that point of view, we may need a separate message to warn
users who _do_ want listing with '-l' before jk/branch-l-1-removal
removes it?
The jk/branch-l-2-resurrection topic later repurposes '-l' for
'--list' but until that happens 'git branch -l' will error not, no?
