Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
> From: Leif Middelschulte <[email protected]>
>
Subject: merge-recursive: give notice when submodule commit gets fast-forwarded
perhaps?
> /* Case #1: a is contained in b or vice versa */
> if (in_merge_bases(commit_a, commit_b)) {
> oidcpy(result, b);
> + if (show(o, 3)) {
> + output(o, 1, _("Fast-forwarding submodule %s to the
> following commit:"), path);
> + output_commit_title(o, commit_b);
> + } else if (show(o, 2))
> + output(o, 2, _("Fast-forwarding submodule %s to %s"),
> path, oid_to_hex(b));
> + else
> + ; /* no output */
> +
merge.verbosity::
Controls the amount of output shown by the recursive merge
strategy. Level 0 outputs nothing except a final error
message if conflicts were detected. Level 1 outputs only
conflicts, 2 outputs conflicts and file changes. Level 5 and
above outputs debugging information. The default is level 2.
Can be overridden by the `GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY` environment variable.
So, by default, we report the fact that we update submodule to a
particular commit, which is quite similar to how we report auto
merged paths using the content level 3-way merge; when you squint
your eyes, the "fast-forward" of submodules look somewhat like a
content-level 3-way merge anyway ;-)
And at level 3, which currently is used to report a non-event that
does not change the result of the merge from what was naturally
expected, we give a bit more detail by citing the commit the
submodule gets fast-forwarded to [*1*].
Sort of makes sense.
[Footnote]
*1* I wonder if that is really necessary, though---we do not give
"here is a diff" or "this is the new contents" after a path gets
merged for normal files. And if it is needed perhaps because
submodules are so special, I wonder if we also need to give the
commit the submodule gets fast-forwarded from, i.e. the original
one, the same way.
