Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> I don't know what would go in the <explanation here> blank above, >>> though. Is it possible that some people are relying on this option >>> combination? >> >> I do not necessarily think we must say "it happens not to work >> already for such and such reasons, lucky us!", but it is indeed a >> good idea to think things through, justifying why this cannot be a >> regression, and record the fact that we did that thinking, in the >> log message. >> >> Thanks. > > I wanted to give a day or two or think about the <explanation here>. > Does "Thanks." mean you have picked up the patch and adjusted the > commit message appropriately, or should I go with my original plan and > resend it later with "explanantion there"?
The latter, "Thanks for a review". I may have picked it up in 'pu', but that merely means, as usual, that I wanted to add a reminder in What's cooking to expect a reroll, and nothing more. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
