Martin Ågren <martin.ag...@gmail.com> writes: > On 9 May 2018 at 18:19, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > >>> It should be totally safe. If you look at "struct lock_file", it is now >>> simply a pointer to a tempfile allocated on the heap (in fact, I thought >>> about getting rid of lock_file entirely, but the diff is noisy and it >>> actually has some value as an abstraction over a pure tempfile). >> >> Ah.. I did miss that "everything on heap" thing. Sorry for the noise >> Martin and thanks for clarification Jeff :) > > Hey, no problem. In fact, the "noise" as you call it had some signal in > it: the commit messages should obviously say more about this.
Thanks all for working it out.
