Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>:
> But in fact the current options list doesn't seem to be well organized at all.
I agree.
> What do you think would be a logical way to group these?
>
> Features of input syntax
>
> --date-format
> --done
>
> Verbosity
>
> --quiet
> --stats
>
> Marks handling (checkpoint/restore)
>
> --import-marks
> --import-marks-if-exists
> --export-marks
> --relative-marks
>
> Semantics of execution
>
> --dry-run
> --force
> --cat-blob-fd
> --export-pack-edges
>
> Tuning
>
> --active-branches
> --max-pack-size
> --big-file-threshold
> --depth
That would work as well or better than any other organization I can
think of. Um, which is significant because my work on surgery tools
and exporters means I've had to consult this page a *lot*.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
