Hi Johannes, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> Once upon a time, I dreamt of an interactive rebase that would not > flatten branch structure, but instead recreate the commit topology > faithfully. [...] > Think of --rebase-merges as "--preserve-merges done right". Both option names seem to miss the primary point of the mode of operation that you've formulated in the first sentence. I suggest to rather call the new option in accordance to your description, say, --no-flatten, --keep-topology, or --preserve-shape. Besides, this way the option name will only specify one thing: _what_ it is about, leaving out the _how_ part, that could vary and could then be specified as option value or as another companion option(s), that is usually considered to be an indication of a good design. -- Sergey
