On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
>> I actually think compact-summary was a good way to phrase it.
>>
>> Personally, I think it was a UI mistake that --summary can be given
>> independently with or without --stat (instead, there shouldn't have
>> been the --summary option, and instead when it was added, --stat
>> just should have gained an extra kind of output).  A single option
>> that can give both kinds of info may be a good way forward, so
>> another possibility may be --summary-in-stat (meaning: the info
>> given by summary is included in stat output).  I dunno.
>
> +Eric maybe he has some idea (sorry I forgot to include people from
> the last round).

What about the earlier suggestion[1] (and minor follow-ups[2,3]) of
making this another option to --stat= (for instance, --stat=compact)?
Did that idea get shot down or am I misunderstanding the question
here.

[1]: 
https://public-inbox.org/git/capig+cqlgs59jyxcmk30qy307arwqjx6pnoo95z39_jj9+d...@mail.gmail.com/
[2]: 
https://public-inbox.org/git/cacsjy8b5qrn8t1aai3y3nfec5baqn2xkk6vzozmp5lh-mpz...@mail.gmail.com/
[3]: 
https://public-inbox.org/git/CACsJy8CPHk+aXHr-mkHZi27s=c3+ny8d9csuzoso8pwevib...@mail.gmail.com/

Reply via email to