On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> +static int move_worktree(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
>>> +{
>>> + [...]
>>> + worktrees = get_worktrees(0);
>>> + wt = find_worktree(worktrees, prefix, av[0]);
>>> + if (!wt)
>>> + die(_("'%s' is not a working tree"), av[0]);
>>
>> This is still leaking 'worktrees'[1]. You probably want
>> free_worktrees() immediately after the find_worktree() invocation.
>
> Sorry, free_worktrees() after the last use of 'wt' since you still
> need to access its fields, which would be the end of the function.
I learned SANITIZE=leak today! It not only catches this but also "dst".
Jeff is there any ongoing effort to make the test suite pass with
SANITIZE=leak? My t2038 passed, so I went ahead with the full test
suite and saw so many failures. I did see in your original mails that
you focused on t0000 and t0001 only..
--
Duy
