Hi Jake,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > In the previous patches, we implemented the basic functionality of the
> > `git rebase -i --recreate-merges` command, in particular the `merge`
> > command to create merge commits in the sequencer.
> >
> > The interactive rebase is a lot more these days, though, than a simple
> > cherry-pick in a loop. For example, it calls the post-rewrite hook (if
> > any) after rebasing with a mapping of the old->new commits. And the
> > interactive rebase also supports the autosquash mode, where commits
> > whose oneline is of the form `fixup! <oneline>` or `squash! <oneline>`
> > are rearranged to amend commits whose oneline they match.
> >
> > This patch implements the post-rewrite and autosquash handling for the
> > `merge` command we just introduced. The other commands that were added
> > recently (`label`, `reset` and `bud`) do not create new commits,
> > therefore post-rewrite & autosquash do not need to handle them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > refs.c | 3 ++-
> > sequencer.c | 10 +++++++---
> > t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh | 39
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> > index 20ba82b4343..e8b84c189ff 100644
> > --- a/refs.c
> > +++ b/refs.c
> > @@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ int dwim_log(const char *str, int len, struct object_id
> > *oid, char **log)
> > static int is_per_worktree_ref(const char *refname)
> > {
> > return !strcmp(refname, "HEAD") ||
> > - starts_with(refname, "refs/bisect/");
> > + starts_with(refname, "refs/bisect/") ||
> > + starts_with(refname, "refs/rewritten/");
> > }
>
> Would this part make more sense to move into the commit that
> introduces writing these refs, or does it only matter once you start
> this step here?
>
> >
> > static int is_pseudoref_syntax(const char *refname)
> > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> > index 1bef16647b4..b63bfb9a141 100644
> > --- a/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sequencer.c
> > @@ -2413,10 +2413,13 @@ static int pick_commits(struct todo_list
> > *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
> > res = do_reset(item->arg, item->arg_len);
> > else if (item->command == TODO_BUD)
> > res = do_reset("onto", 4);
> > - else if (item->command == TODO_MERGE)
> > + else if (item->command == TODO_MERGE) {
> > res = do_merge(item->commit,
> > item->arg, item->arg_len, opts);
> > - else if (!is_noop(item->command))
> > + if (item->commit)
> > +
> > record_in_rewritten(&item->commit->object.oid,
> > + peek_command(todo_list,
> > 1));
> > + } else if (!is_noop(item->command))
> > return error(_("unknown command %d"),
> > item->command);
> >
> > todo_list->current++;
> > @@ -3556,7 +3559,8 @@ int rearrange_squash(void)
> > struct subject2item_entry *entry;
> >
> > next[i] = tail[i] = -1;
> > - if (item->command >= TODO_EXEC) {
> > + if (item->command >= TODO_EXEC &&
> > + (item->command != TODO_MERGE || !item->commit)) {
> > subjects[i] = NULL;
> > continue;
> > }
> > diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
> > b/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
> > index 46ae52f88b3..76e615bd7c1 100755
> > --- a/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
> > +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
> > @@ -143,4 +143,43 @@ test_expect_success 'with a branch tip that was
> > cherry-picked already' '
> > EOF
> > '
> >
> > +test_expect_success 'refs/rewritten/* is worktree-local' '
> > + git worktree add wt &&
> > + cat >wt/script-from-scratch <<-\EOF &&
> > + label xyz
> > + exec GIT_DIR=../.git git rev-parse --verify refs/rewritten/xyz >a
> > || :
> > + exec git rev-parse --verify refs/rewritten/xyz >b
> > + EOF
> > +
> > + test_config -C wt sequence.editor \""$PWD"/replace-editor.sh\" &&
> > + git -C wt rebase -i HEAD &&
> > + test_must_be_empty wt/a &&
> > + test_cmp_rev HEAD "$(cat wt/b)"
> > +'
> > +
>
> Same for the test here, I can't figure out why this is necessary in
> this patch as opposed to the patch which first introduced the
> refs/rewritten/<label> refs.
Woops. This was its own commit, and must have been accidentally squashed
during one of my rebases. Will re-introduce it; this is roughly what it
will look like:
-- snipsnap --
Author: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
Subject: sequencer: make refs generated by the `label` command worktree-local
This allows for rebases to be run in parallel in separate worktrees
(think: interrupted in the middle of one rebase, being asked to perform
a different rebase, adding a separate worktree just for that job).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 20ba82b4343..e8b84c189ff 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ int dwim_log(const char *str, int len, struct object_id
*oid, char **log)
static int is_per_worktree_ref(const char *refname)
{
return !strcmp(refname, "HEAD") ||
- starts_with(refname, "refs/bisect/");
+ starts_with(refname, "refs/bisect/") ||
+ starts_with(refname, "refs/rewritten/");
}
static int is_pseudoref_syntax(const char *refname)
diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
b/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
index f5e476d948b..50a8eefc81e 100755
--- a/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
+++ b/t/t3430-rebase-recreate-merges.sh
@@ -115,4 +115,18 @@ test_expect_success 'generate correct todo list' '
test_cmp expect output
'
+test_expect_success 'refs/rewritten/* is worktree-local' '
+ git worktree add wt &&
+ cat >wt/script-from-scratch <<-\EOF &&
+ label xyz
+ exec GIT_DIR=../.git git rev-parse --verify refs/rewritten/xyz >a || :
+ exec git rev-parse --verify refs/rewritten/xyz >b
+ EOF
+
+ test_config -C wt sequence.editor \""$PWD"/replace-editor.sh\" &&
+ git -C wt rebase -i HEAD &&
+ test_must_be_empty wt/a &&
+ test_cmp_rev HEAD "$(cat wt/b)"
+'
+
test_done
