On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Nathan PAYRE <[email protected]> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>: writes:
>> Also "reusable in other place" is by itself not an unconditional
>> plus, until readers can be convinced that that 'other place' really
>> wants to be able to call this function.  Is there some untold
>> motivation behind this change---such as a planned update to actually
>> use this helper subroutine?
>
> This subroutine will be used to implement, initially a new option called
> "--quote-email", but became "--cite" added after "--in-reply-to".
> This will permit to the user to cite a mail and reply with a patch and keep
> Cc, To ...
> See discussion :
> https://public-inbox.org/git/[email protected]/

Although he didn't state so explicitly, please take Junio's question
as a strong hint that you should update the commit message to include
the above rationale/explanation about why you consider this a good
change. The reason for including the motivation in the commit message
is that you want, not only to convince Junio now that this is a useful
change, but to convince future readers of the project history that
this change is desirable.

Reply via email to