Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> writes: > Anyway there is a design choice to be made. Adding a "const char > *default" argument makes the function more generic,...
I didn't suggest anything of that sort, and I do not understand why you are repeatedly talking about "default" that you considered and rejected, as if it were an alternative viable option. I agree that "default" is not yet a good idea and it is a solution to a problem that is not yet shown to exist. On the other hand, just assigning NULL to *arg when you did not see a delimiting '=', on the other hand, is an alternative option that is viable. > .... I think setting > "arg" to NULL increases the risk of crashes and makes it too easy to > make "--key" and "--key=" behave differently which I think is not > consistent and not intuitive. So now this is very specific to the need of command line argument parsing and is not a generic thing? You cannot have your cake and eat it too, though.
