Andrew Ardill <andrew.ard...@gmail.com> writes: > On 13 December 2012 04:49, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> "bisect" with "<used-to-be, now-is> vs >> <good, bad>" issue unsettled > > Would you want to see this issue resolved in-script before a porting > attempt was started?
Honestly, I do not care too much either way, but for the people who want to work either on the rewrite-to-C or on the semantics issue, it would be easier to manage it that way. And that "issue resolved in-script" does not have to be "implemented in-script". The resolution could be to declare that it is not worth it and a promise to call the two states <good, bad> and with no other names. It would give a semantics for the rewriters-to-C can start working on that is stable enough ;-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
