Hi Junio, On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> writes: > > >> > I feel this is the wrong way round. `>/dev/null` may sound very intuitive > >> > to you, but this feature is Windows only. Guess three times how intuitive > >> > it sounds to Windows developers to write `>/dev/null` if you want to > >> > suppress output... > >> > >> It would be just as intuitive to write '2>&1' for dup-redirection, > > > > No. You misunderstand. I was mainly concerned with the `/dev/null`. Every > > Windows developer knows what `>file.txt` means, and many know what > > `2>error.txt` means. But `/dev/null` is not Windows, period. > > Actually I did know that much. > > If I was correct in assuming that "2>&1" is just as foreign as > ">/dev/null", then we should be shunning "2>&1" just like we shun > ">/dev/null". That was all I meant to say. Did you know that `2>&1` works in Powershell? > Are you saying "2>&1" is just as likely to be known as ">file.txt" > and my assumption of foreignness of "2>&1" was incorrect? > > Side note: would ">NUL" look more familiar, I wonder, and > can stand for ">/dev/null" for the target audience? > > > ... It is so not > > Windows that Git itself translates it to `NUL` (which you Linux die-hards > > won't have a clue about, I would wager a bet). > > Ah, you lost your bet. When can I collect ;-)? As soon as we meet in person again. Ciao, Dscho
