Hi,

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Alex Vandiver <ale...@dropbox.com> writes:
> 
> > diff --git a/fsmonitor.c b/fsmonitor.c
> > index 4ea44dcc6..417759224 100644
> > --- a/fsmonitor.c
> > +++ b/fsmonitor.c
> > @@ -49,20 +49,7 @@ int read_fsmonitor_extension(struct index_state *istate, 
> > const void *data,
> >             ewah_free(fsmonitor_dirty);
> >             return error("failed to parse ewah bitmap reading fsmonitor 
> > index extension");
> >     }
> > -
> > -   if (git_config_get_fsmonitor()) {
> > -           /* Mark all entries valid */
> > -           for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
> > -                   istate->cache[i]->ce_flags |= CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
> > -
> > -           /* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
> > -           ewah_each_bit(fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
> > -
> > -           /* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
> > -           if (istate->untracked)
> > -                   istate->untracked->use_fsmonitor = 1;
> > -   }
> > -   ewah_free(fsmonitor_dirty);
> > +   istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
> 
> This makes local variable "int i;" in this function unused and gets
> compiler warning.

... to which end we introduced the DEVELOPER flag to catch these: if you
call

        make DEVELOPER=1

and compile with GCC or Clang, it will elevate such warnings to errors,
and we highly encourage contributors to build their patched source code
with said flag.

Thanks,
Johannes

Reply via email to