Hey Junio, On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes: > >> On 02/10/17 14:44, Pranit Bauva wrote: >> [snip] >>>... >> Yes, I also meant to tidy that up by removing some, now >> redundant, initialisation later in that function. >> >> Note, that wasn't the only bug! (I have probably forgotten >> some of them, but look at 964f4e2b0, for example). > > It seems that Pranit needs a bit more work to take known fixes from > your efforts and we should wait for the series to be rerolled?
This series is the initial part of the whole series. Things started to get a little problematic after bisect_start(). The reason I am doing the series in parts so that I can get the part which is solid to be merged and then start work on later parts since I don't have a time constraint now. Regards, Pranit Bauva
