Hi Junio,

On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------
> [Cooking]
> 
> [...]
> 
> * mk/diff-delta-uint-may-be-shorter-than-ulong (2017-08-10) 1 commit
>  . diff-delta: fix encoding size that would not fit in "unsigned int"
> 
>  The machinery to create xdelta used in pack files received the
>  sizes of the data in size_t, but lost the higher bits of them by
>  storing them in "unsigned int" during the computation, which is
>  fixed.
> 
>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> 
> [...]
> 
> * mk/use-size-t-in-zlib (2017-08-10) 1 commit
>  . zlib.c: use size_t for size
> 
>  The wrapper to call into zlib followed our long tradition to use
>  "unsigned long" for sizes of regions in memory, which have been
>  updated to use "size_t".
> 
>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> 
> 
> * mk/diff-delta-avoid-large-offset (2017-08-11) 1 commit
>  . diff-delta: do not allow delta offset truncation
> 
>  The delta format used in the packfile cannot reference data at
>  offset larger than what can be expressed in 4-byte, but the
>  generator for the data failed to make sure the offset does not
>  overflow.  This has been corrected.
> 
>  Dropped, as it was rerolled for review as part of a larger series.
>  cf. <1502914591-26215-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause>
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> [Discarded]
> 
> [...]

These three topics are still in the wrong category. Please fix.

Ciao,
Dscho

Reply via email to