Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Mahmoud Al-Qudsi <mqu...@neosmart.net> writes: > >> The default git behavior when attempting to `git checkout xxx` for >> some value of "xxx" that cannot be resolved to a single, unique >> file/path/branch/tag/commit/etc is to display the following: > ... > So a possible implementation approach would be > > - to let the current code do what it is doing > > - except that you add new code immediately before the code that > issues 'xxx' did not match (i.e. the code already checked that > 'xxx' taken as a pathspec does not match anything, and about to > give the error message but hasn't done so just yet). > > - your new code > > . checks if 'xxx' could be an attempt to refer to a rev but > insufficiently spelled out (e.g. both origin[12]/xxx exists, or > for a bonus point, a similarly named origin/xxy exists and > could be a typo). > > . if the above check found something, then you report it and > terminate without complaining "pathspec 'xxx' did not > match..." > > . on the other hand, if the above check did not find anything, > then you let the current code issue the same error message as > before.
I was sweeping my mailbox to collect loose ends that haven't been tied down, and noticed that this topic does not seem to have reached a conclusion. Do we want to reboot the effort? Or should we just throw it in the #leftoverbits bin for now? Thanks.
