On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
> Any chance the "did not happen with 2.13" was not > freshly cloned but tested on an existing repo? If so a hot > candidate for suspicion is a93dcb0a56 (Merge branch > 'bw/submodule-is-active', 2017-03-30), IMHO, just > gut feeling, though. which makes it a feature, I should add.
