On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote: > I would prefer if we could squash all these commits together into > one since it seems to me one logical step, using the new variable > for update belongs together with its configuration on > initialization.
Works for me. I could also try to rework the patch boundaries if a monolithic patch is not acceptable. I agree that the current documentation assignments are fairly arbitrary. If I don't hear from anyone in favor of keeping them separate, v5 will be monolithic. -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
