Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> Just shuffle the die() part to make it more explicit, and cleanup the
> code-style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> ---
> transport-helper.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/transport-helper.c b/transport-helper.c
> index 32ad877..0c95101 100644
> --- a/transport-helper.c
> +++ b/transport-helper.c
> @@ -775,6 +775,9 @@ static int push_refs_with_export(struct transport
> *transport,
> char *private;
> unsigned char sha1[20];
>
> + if (ref->deletion)
> + die("remote-helpers do not support ref deletion");
> +
> if (!data->refspecs)
> continue;
This is not just "just shuffle the die to make it explicit" but it
does change the semantics; earlier ref->deletion was perfectly fine
as long as data->refspecs is not given, but the new code always
dies.
If this semantic change is a good thing, please explain why it is so
in the log message. If the change is "it does not matter because
when data->refspecs is not given and ref->deletion is set, we die
later elsewhere in the code anyway", then it needs to be described.
Thanks.
> @@ -784,10 +787,6 @@ static int push_refs_with_export(struct transport
> *transport,
> }
> free(private);
>
> - if (ref->deletion) {
> - die("remote-helpers do not support ref deletion");
> - }
> -
> if (ref->peer_ref)
> string_list_append(&revlist_args, ref->peer_ref->name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
