On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:26:40PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:24 PM, brian m. carlson
> <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> > I realize this was worded poorly.  So for my example, in this case, we'd
> > do:
> >
> > test-helper-hash-string "263 410"
> >
> > For SHA-1, we'd get "263 410".  For SHA-256, we'd get "313 481" (which,
> > as SHA-256 blobs, both start with "17" in their hex representation).
> > Presumably we'd read some environment variable to determine the proper
> > value.
> 
> This is what Junio proposed in the first message, except that we defer that
> to a shell script as for each test we may need different things, so a helper 
> may
> be of little value?

I think a shell script may end up being a fine helper for our needs.  In
any case, I think we're in violent agreement.  My proposal was just an
idea I had considered when thinking about how to do this, and any
suitable solution is fine with me.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to