On 26/07/17 04:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Raman Gupta <rocketra...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 26/07/17 02:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> I haven't tried this patch, but would this work well with options >>> meant for the 'git rev-list --parents "$@"' that grabs the list of >>> merge commits to learn from? e.g. >>> >>> $ contrib/rerere-train.sh -n 4 --merges master >>> $ contrib/rerere-train.sh --overwrite -n 4 --merges master >>> $ contrib/rerere-train.sh -n 4 --overwrite --merges master >>> >>> I do not think it is necessary to make the last one work; as long as >>> the first two work as expected, we are good even if the last one >>> dies with a sensible message e.g. "options X, Y and Z must be given >>> before other options" (currently "X, Y and Z" consists only of >>> "--overwrite", but I think you get what I mean). >> >> You're right -- I didn't try all the cases. I wasn't able to figure >> out how to get `rev-parse --parseopt` to deal with this situation, so >> I did it manually. I'm not super-happy with the result, but it does >> work. Look for PATCH v3. > > Yes, I think you could squash the two case arms in the later loop > into one i.e. > > -h|--help|-o|--overwrite) > die "please don't." ;;
I considered that but decided the non-collapsed version better supports this list growing in the future. > but still the repetition does look ugly. Agreed. > As a contrib/ material, I do not care too deeply about it, though. > > Will queue. Thanks. Regards, Raman
