On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 07:58:06PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > > And here's one more patch on top of those that's necessary to get the > > tests to pass (I don't expect anybody to necessarily be applying this > > slow string of patches; it's just to show the direction I'm looking in). > > I've looked at your original patch, which modified reflog-walk.c, and it > does fix the issue. I'm happy to send in a patch with that and a test > (provided you're okay with me adding your sign-off), or if you wanted to > send in something a bit more complete, like the series of patches here, > that's fine, too.
I've been on vacation for the past week, but wrapping this up is on my todo. I'll try to get to it tonight. -Peff
