Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91...@gmail.com> writes:

> The commit template adds the optional parts without
> a new line to distinguish them. This results in
> difficulty in interpreting it's content, specifically
> for inexperienced users.
>
> Add new lines to separate the distinct parts of the
> template.
> ---
>  I tried writing tests to ensure that the new line is added
>  but as it seems to require checking multi-line, special 
>  options of grep were required to check. I tried the following,
>
>    test_expect_success 'new line found before status message' '
>     ! (GIT_EDITOR="cat >editor-input" git commit) &&
>     grep -Pz "#\n# On branch" editor-input
>    '
>
>  It worked well locally but seems to make the build with 
>  GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease to fail. So, I removed it.
>  Not sure how to write a good test for this change, sorry :(

The above is a good way to capture the input to the editor, but the
test with "grep -P" which is not portable would not work well.  You
however should be able to prepare an expected output with

        cat >expect <<\-EOF &&
        ... expected contents to editor-input here ...
        EOF

and do "test_i18ncmp expect editor-input" instead of "grep -P".

Reply via email to