Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> writes:

> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:03:13PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] sha1_file: improve sha1_object_info_extended
>>> Improve sha1_object_info_extended() by supporting additional flags. This
>>> allows has_sha1_file_with_flags() to be modified to use
>>> sha1_object_info_extended() in a subsequent patch.
>>
>> A minor nit, but try to avoid vague words like "improve" in your subject
>> lines. Something like:
>>
>>   sha1_file: teach sha1_object_info_extended more flags
>>
>> That's not too specific either, but I think in --oneline output it gives
>> you a much better clue about what part of the function it touches.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  cache.h     |  4 ++++
>>>  sha1_file.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> The patch itself looks good.
>
> Thanks. I did try, but all my attempts exceeded 50 characters. Maybe
> "sha1_file: support more flags in object info query" is good enough.

Between the two, I personally find that Peff's is more descriptive,
so unless there are other changes planned, let me "rebase -i" to
retitle the commit.

Thanks.

Reply via email to