Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > `for_each_bisect_ref()` is called by `for_each_bad_bisect_ref()` with > a term "bad". This used to make it call `for_each_ref_in_submodule()` > with a prefix "refs/bisect/bad". But the latter is the name of the > reference that is being sought, so the empty string was being passed > to the callback as the trimmed refname. Moreover, this questionable > practice was turned into an error by > > b9c8e7f2fb prefix_ref_iterator: don't trim too much, 2017-05-22 > > It makes more sense (and agrees better with the documentation of > `--bisect`) for the callers to receive the full reference names. So > > * Add a new function, `for_each_fullref_in_submodule()`, to the refs > API. > > * Change `for_each_bad_bisect_ref()` to call the new function rather > than `for_each_ref_in_submodule()`.
This unfortunately makes nd/prune-in-worktree topic rather obsolete. Can somebody volunteer to update it to newer codebase including this fix? Thanks.
