liam Beguin <liambeg...@gmail.com> writes: >> The fact a stash entry is a merge commit of two synthetic commits is an >> implementation detail. It can be very useful at times for power users, >> but regular Git users need not be concerned with this. >> >> Another fact worth reiterating that what the UI displays to the user is >> better to match what the user reads in the docs. ;-) > > I'll make changes as suggested by Junio. I slightly prefer > "Your stash has %d entry/entries" over "You have %d stash/stashes" > but I'll go with what's used elsewhere in the documentation.
Yup, I agree that I would definitely call them "stash entries" if I were writing the documentation today, but lets match the new message to the existing lingo first and think about renaming "a stash" to "a stash entry" as a separate step. The latter would become a larger change (we'd also need to add an entry to glossary-contents.txt). Thanks.
