Excerpts from Junio C Hamano's message of Mon Nov 19 05:55:18 +0100 2012: > Define what you mean by "contents". contents = the files git archive HEAD would put into an archive, those determining a build result.
How could the repo be compromised: 1) An attacker triest to find a hash collision in the HEAD tree. However finding a hash collision which also is a useful attack should be very hard. 2) The attacker modifies a file the way he likes (thus the attack is easy), then he tries to modify the history in a way causing the same commit hash. Probably this is very hard, too. Does this make sense? I feared that having a HEAD^ you can manipulate to change the hash of HEAD makes it easier to cause a collision without the user noticing. However adding additional useless files to HEAD could be used to cause a imaginary hash collision, too. Thus having a second hash would not be of any benefit. Thus referring to commit by hash (using all hash digits) is best you can do. I finally got it. Thanks Marc Weber -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
