> I didn't mean to change this bit, it should remain "if > (!num_threads)". I was in the middle of monkeypatching and didn't > review the diff carefully enough. But it any case, without this change > the rest of this diff is your proposed (but segfaulting) change as I > understand it.
Sorry for the proposing a sloppy alternative. (I missed one occurrence of num_threads used in a conditional). I think the original is still better than littering comments everywhere.
