On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > (apologies for the self-followup:) > > On 05/30/17 14:28, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> Note that in such an incremental review, I specifically wish to compare >> patches against each other (i.e., I'd like to see diffs of diffs, AKA >> interdiffs), and not the source tree at two, v1<->v2, commits into the >> two series. The latter would only give me the difference between the v1 >> and v2 patch application results, and while that is valuable as well, >> I'd really like to diff the actual patches. > > ... One (but not the only) reason for that is that I'd like to see the > v1->v2 commit message improvements as well. I quite frequently suggest > commit message improvements in review.
This all makes sense, I think a way to make this length configurable is the easiest/best solution to this. Just curious do you know about https://github.com/trast/tbdiff ? If not it might have a high overlap with what you're doing.
