On 29/05/17 22:02, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 29.05.2017 um 22:40 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Johannes Sixt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/t/t5580-clone-push-unc.sh b/t/t5580-clone-push-unc.sh
>>> index b195f71ea9..fd719a209e 100755
>>> --- a/t/t5580-clone-push-unc.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t5580-clone-push-unc.sh
>>> @@ -1,13 +1,19 @@
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>
>>> -test_description='various UNC path tests (Windows-only)'
>>> +test_description='various Windows-only path tests'
>>> . ./test-lib.sh
>>>
>>> if ! test_have_prereq MINGW; then
>>> - skip_all='skipping UNC path tests, requires Windows'
>>> + skip_all='skipping Windows-only path tests'
>>> test_done
>>> fi
>>>
>>> +test_expect_failure 'remote nick cannot contain backslashes' '
>>> + BACKSLASHED="$(pwd | tr / \\\\)" &&
>>> + git ls-remote "$BACKSLASHED" >out 2>err &&
>>> + ! grep "unable to access" err
>>> +'
>>
>> Doesn't this need test_i18ngrep?:
>
> Good catch! It would be this one in warn_on_inaccessible:
>
>> wrapper.c:581: warning_errno(_("unable to access '%s'"), path);
>
> But actually, I'm more worried about the unholy mix of
> one-test-first-then-skip_all-later that occurs in this test script (I do not
> mean the skip_all that is visible in the context, there are others later). I
> think there was some buzz recently that prove only understands a summary line
> that reads "1..0", but here we would see "1..1". What to do? Reorganize the
> test script? Dscho, any ideas?
See commit c7018be509 ("test: allow skipping the remainder", 18-05-2017)
which is currently merged to the 'next' branch (merge 03b8a61e47 of the
'jc/skip-test-in-the-middle' branch).
(see also http://testanything.org)
If you look at http://testanything.org//tap-specification.html, it shows
that you are allowed to annotate a plan of '1..0' with a SKIP directive
to explain why no tests in a file were run. However, a plan with '1..n'
(for any n > 0) must not have any annotation. (Back in 2012, when I wrote
commit bf4b721932, I found much better documentation than the above!)
So, after commit c7018be509, you can now use the 'skip_all' facility
after having run some tests; it now converts that into an 'SKIP comment'
just before the test plan, effectively skipping the remainder of the
tests in the file. (since we are using a 'trailing plan', and have thus
not declared how many tests we had intended to run, we can output an
accurate plan).
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
