Sorry for super late reply. I'm slowly catching up. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Duy, > > > On Wed, 3 May 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > >> There's plenty of error() in this code to safely assume --quiet is not a >> concern. >> >> t5512 needs update because if we check the path 'refs*master' (i.e. the >> asterisk is part of the path) then we'll get an EINVAL error. > > So the first change in this patch unmasks a bug that is fixed by the > second patch?
The change in read_branches_file() in this patch causes the failure. See the original report [1], [1] http://public-inbox.org/git/3a2686c2-6766-1235-001f-1b5283b5f...@kdbg.org/ -- Duy
