On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Brandon Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> if (flags & REATTACH_HEAD_DIE_ON_ERROR)
> die(...);
>
> return -1;
>
> It just feels weird to me to have the inverted logic, that's my opinion
> though.
Yeah, me too. But my feelings were not as important as staying
under 80 characters a line. And as the error message is longer than
the "return -1", I wanted to have it not indented yet another level.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!sub->branch) {
>> + if (!(flags & REATTACH_HEAD_DIE_ON_ERROR))
>> + return -1;
>> + die(_("no branch configured to follow for submodule '%s'"),
>> + sub->path);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* lookup branch value in .gitmodules */
>> + if (strcmp(".", sub->branch)) {
>> + branch = sub->branch;
>> + } else {
>> + /* special care for '.': Is the superproject on a branch? */
>> + struct object_id oid;
>> + branch = resolve_refdup("HEAD", 0, oid.hash, NULL);
>> + if (!branch) {
>> + if (!(flags & REATTACH_HEAD_DIE_ON_ERROR))
>> + return -1;
>> + die(_("Not on any branch, but submodule configured to
>> follow superprojects branch"));
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!strcmp("HEAD", branch))
>> + return 0;
>
> So this is the case where the superproject is in a detached-HEAD state?
and the submodule config is branch='.'
> In that case then we don't need to continue because if the superproject
> isn't on a branch, then there isn't a reason the submodule should be on
> a branch.
agreed.
