On 29/04/17 07:46, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 29.04.2017 um 02:15 schrieb Ramsay Jones: >> On 28/04/17 20:54, Johannes Sixt wrote: >>> Am 28.04.2017 um 05:09 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >>>> Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
>>> t7400.20 does not fail for the MinGW port because the >>> test case only operates on the file system, but never >>> checks whether an entry 'sub\with\backslash' is present >>> in the index. >> >> Ah, OK. I only looked at my (64-bit) MSYS2 build, which fails >> exactly the same as cygwin. Hmm, wait, let me just rebuild on >> MinGW64 ... indeed it passes (well it passes t7400.20, but it >> fails on t7400.11, 61, 63, 87 and 89)! > > I don't observe these failures. Are you using a vanila MSYS2 environment? I am indeed. I thought it would be suitable to use to test some git patches on MinGW, but it seems I was wrong ... :( ATB, Ramsay Jones
