Am 21.04.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Christian Couder:
First bisect should ask you to test merge bases only if there are
"good" commits that are not ancestors of the "bad" commit.
That's a tangent, but I have never understood why this needs to be so.
Consider this:
o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--B
/ /
-o--o--o--o--g--o--o--o--o--G
When I mark B as bad and G as good, why would g have to be tested first?
This is exactly what I do when I bisect in Git history: I mark the
latest commits on git-gui and gitk sub-histories as good, because I know
they can't possibly be bad. (In my setup, these two histories are ahead
of pu and next.)
-- Hannes
