On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Javier Domingo Cansino wrote: > I understand it's not possible / convenient anymore to go back, but > would it be possible to have an option such as `--merged` to support > the old usecase?
There's "branch --merged" already. And in recent versions of git, the scriptable for-each-ref knows it, too. So you could do something like: git for-each-ref --format='delete %(refname)' --merged HEAD refs/heads/ | grep -v 'any-branches-you-want-saved' | git update-ref --stdin The "--merged" option to git-branch is only used for listing. In theory we could use it for selection in other operations, like "git branch -d --merged". But I'm not sure how you'd tell it _not_ to delete the branch that matches HEAD. -Peff
