On 03/29/2017 11:56 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > On 03/29/2017 02:32 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote: >> [...] > [...] > The disagreement is not a surprise, because there isn't a corresponding > coding error in the code below that returns the directory itself in a > post-order iteration. The net result appears to be that there is no > recursion at all into subdirectories when `DIR_ITERATOR_DEPTH_FIRST` is > set. So due to this bug, we get neither a correct post-order iteration > nor a correct pre-order iteration with the new option.
Correction: the second-to-last sentence should read "there is no recursion at all into subdirectories when `DIR_ITERATOR_DEPTH_FIRST` is *NOT* set. Michael
