Alex Henrie <alexhenri...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, that makes sense. I assume that when you talk about 'next', you
> mean 'master'?
No, I do mean 'next'. See "A note from the maintainer" post that
are sent to the list every once in a while (i.e. after a new release
is tagged) for the project structure.
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqy3vztypi....@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/
> If we want to use `git -p log` in a test, we'll have to change the
> behavior of pager_in_use(). Alternatively, we could use
> `GIT_PAGER_IN_USE=1 git log` instead.
Testing "git -p" is not the goal; testing that decorate defaults to
auto during an interactive session is. We could run tests under pty
like t7006 does using lib-terminal.sh if we really want to emulate
an interactive session.
Exporting GIT_PAGER_IN_USE may be sufficient for the purpose of
convincing the command to be in an interactive session for this
test, even though it feels a bit too brittle to depend on the
internal implementation detail.
Thanks.
