On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:51:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
> > index 9c70662cc8..59f055e27b 100755
> > --- a/git-stash.sh
> > +++ b/git-stash.sh
> > @@ -299,10 +299,10 @@ push_stash () {
> >     then
> >             if test $# != 0
> >             then
> > -                   git reset ${GIT_QUIET:+-q} -- "$@"
> > +                   git reset -q -- "$@"
> >                     git ls-files -z --modified -- "$@" |
> >                     git checkout-index -z --force --stdin
> > -                   git clean --force ${GIT_QUIET:+-q} -d -- "$@"
> > +                   git clean --force -q -d -- "$@"
> >             else
> >                     git reset --hard ${GIT_QUIET:+-q}
> >             fi
> 
> Yup, we only said "HEAD is now at ..." in the non-pathspec case (and
> we of course still do).  We didn't report changes to which paths
> have been reverted in (or which new paths are removed from) the
> working tree to the original state (and we of course still don't).
> 
> The messages from reset and clean that reports these probably do not
> need to be shown by default to the users (they can always check with
> "git stash show" when they are curious or when they want to double
> check).

I'm not sure if you are arguing here that the non-pathspec case should
move to an unconditional "-q", too, to suppress the "HEAD is now at"
message.  But I think that is a good suggestion. It would make the two
cases consistent, and it is not really adding anything of value (it is
always just HEAD, and if you do not provide a custom message, the
short-sha1 and subject are already in the "Saved..." line above).

-Peff

Reply via email to