Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> writes: >> >>> On 03/09, Valery Tolstov wrote: >>>> Remove code fragment from module_clone that duplicates functionality >>>> of connect_work_tree_and_git_dir in dir.c >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Valery Tolstov <m...@vtolstov.org> >>> >>> Looks good. >> >> I'll queue with your Reviewed-by: added. >> >> If sb/checkout-recurse-submodules is going to be rerolled, I'd >> appreciate if it includes this patch inserted at an appropriate >> place in the series, instead of me having to remember re-applying >> this patch every time it happens. > > Instead of mixing these two series, can you just take Valerys series as is, > and sb/checkout-recurse-submodules builds on top of that when rerolled?
That's fine by me, too, but that still means I need to keep an eye on two independent topics that interact each other. Is a single patch 2/2 that important to be on a separate topic? Expressed in another way, is it expected that sb/checkout-recurse-submodules would take forever to mature relative to these two patches?
